More than two decades later and this is something we’re entirely accustomed to now, not to mention having various other avenues and nefarious platforming strategies for how movies are accessed digitally in addition to physically.
But what DVD managed to do, even more so than VHS, was democratize home video collecting. With VHS, there was guesswork and even research involved with how to buy something, if it was even available, and the cost of entry could be steep on a per title basis (especially if your interests went outside of the mainstream and/or were international) but with DVD, retailers and studios alike saw a market that they didn’t with VHS, turning home video into something that was typically rented into a commodity posed to battle for precious shelf real estate in consumer’s homes, alongside books and CDs.
It’s safe to say that for many, if not most, current-day home video collectors, DVD was the catalyst for their collections. There are plenty of people out there that did (and still do) collect VHS, LaserDisc and even other, more niche, formats like CED or Beta, but DVD saw a sea-change in not only how we collect home video but why we collect home video.
LaserDisc offered the potential for ancillary materials like multiple audio tracks, extra features and even multiple cuts of the same film packaged alongside the theatrical release, with both major studios offering more lavish sets than their VHS counterparts alongside boutique labels like The Criterion Collection vying for both the money and respect of serious collectors. DVD took what had been happening for years, on a small scale, with LaserDisc, made it the norm and then expanded upon that until there was seemingly nowhere else to go.